![]() This year, we're also testing vanilla Xiph Icecast. Are there any internal bottlenecks in the streaming server that prevent it from scaling?. ![]() Does the streaming server effectively use all available cores?.Important to test the maximum capacity of streaming server to check scaling behaviour: This question is important for broadcasters because more efficient streaming server software meansīeing able to serve more listeners on the same (or even slower) hardware, leading to cost savings. Which streaming audio server can handle the most listeners? We'll also be trying to improve our benchmarking technique and answer two questions:ġ. This year, we're going to try ramping up each server to 240,000 listeners and see what happens. ![]() With the release of RSAS 1.0, weĭecided it was time for a new round of benchmarks. RSAS was shown to be the fastest streaming audio server, with the lowest CPU usage, which is the main bottleneck. See how each performed with 10,000 listeners connected. Three years ago, we benchmarked RSAS, Icecast-KH, and SHOUTcast to
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |